Harris v. Aramark Incorporation et al
Plaintiff: Herman Harris, Jr
Defendant: Aramark Incorporation, Brad Gillespie, Timothy Shoop, Stephen Ratcliff, C. Crockett Harris, Justin Swanson, Chad Kahn, Chad Hunt and Gail Sayre
Case Number: 2:2017cv00872
Filed: October 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: PICKAWAY
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 77 OPINION and ORDER adopting 73 the Report and Recommendation; granting in part 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 45 Motion to Dismiss; granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting 56 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/2/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION and ORDER adopting and affirming 23 the Report and Recommendation; granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Filing. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/20/19. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 Amended Complaint: It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS all claims for monetary damages against the Individual Defendants in their official capacities and any claims based solely on a Defendant's supervis ory capacity. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's negligence claim under state law against the Individual Defendants be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal should the Ohio Court of 8 Claims determine that the state employees are not en titled to immunity under O.R.C. § 9.86. Finally, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his remaining claims. Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on January 11, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Aramark Incorporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Herman Harris, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Incorporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Gillespie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Shoop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Ratcliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Crockett Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Kahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gail Sayre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?