Bates v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Bates v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Bates v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Bryan Bates
Respondent:	Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2017cv00973
Filed:	November 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	ROSS
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly A. Jolson
Presiding Judge:	Edmund A. Sargus
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 5, 2017	Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 3 the Magistrate Judge's 11/15/17 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Objection 4 is overruled. This case is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as succe ssive. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 12/05/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 15, 2017	Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS transferring 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as successive. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 11/15/2017. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 5, 2017

Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 3 the Magistrate Judge's 11/15/17 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Objection 4 is overruled. This case is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as succe ssive. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 12/05/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

November 15, 2017

Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS transferring 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as successive. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 11/15/2017. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bates v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryan Bates
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?