Whiteside v. Thalheimer, et al.
| Norman V. Whiteside |
| Trayce Thalheimer, Cynthia Mausser, Kathleen Kovach, Ellen Venters, R.F. Rauschenberg, Mark Houk, Andre Imbrogno, Ron Nelson, Michael Sheets, Kenny Sexton, Karla Williams, Michael Jackson, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Jane/John Does X 100 |
| 2:2017cv01036 |
| November 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION and ORDER adopting 25 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 10/3/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss the claims against Defendants Michael Sheets, Kenny Sexton, Karla Williams, and Michael Jackson without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of proc ess re 6 Amended Complaint, filed by Norman V. Whiteside. Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on July 26, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
