Lee et al v. United States of America
| Gerald Lee and Isabelle Lee |
| United States of America |
| 2:2017cv01090 |
| December 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| MUSKINGUM |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| George C. Smith |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER - Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order 35 is GRANTED. Defendant's omnibus filing 39 is DENIED, in part, to the extent it seeks to compel the deposition of Dr. Amesur; DENIED, in part, to the extent it seeks to exclude the t estimony of Dr. Freeman; GRANTED, in part, to the extent it seeks leave to designate additional rebuttal experts directed to the issues of life expectancy and palliative care only; DENIED, in part, to the extent it seeks leave to designate its own ra diology expert to opine on the defects in Dr. Wallis' radiology report; DENIED, in part, to the extent it seeks an award of sanctions against Plaintiffs relating to the cancellation of Dr. Amesur's deposition. The rebuttal expert disclosure deadline, as limited above, is October 23, 2020. All discovery shall be completed by November 23, 2020 and any dispositive motions shall be filed by December 23, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/22/20. (jlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
