Manley v. Hughes et al
| Rammie Manley |
| L. Hughes, M. Filipowicz, Jo Hall, J. Seech, W. Wine, J. Shannon, M. Williams, T. Dotson, M. Stevens, M. Robinson and Ohio Department of Correction & Rehab |
| 2:2018cv00310 |
| April 9, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting and affirming 6 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/25/18. (jk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant ODRC be dismissed for failure to assert any claim on which relief may be granted. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be TRANSFERRED pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 1404(a) or 1406 to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division at Youngstown re 1 Complaint, filed by Rammie Manley. Objections to R&R due by 6/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on May 24, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
