Franklin County Municipal Columbus Ohio et al. v. Parrish
| Franklin County Municipal Columbus Ohio, Mark Hummer, John Kasic, Andrew Genther, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| Donald L. Parrish |
| 2:2018cv00358 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| George C. Smith |
| Chelsey M. Vascura |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 5 in that this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Franklin County Municipal Court. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 6/15/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Defendant's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judicial officers who render services in this action shall do so as if the costs had been prepaid. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court REMAND this action to the Franklin County Municipal Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/27/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
