Hairston v. Maria et al
| Rico I. Hairston |
| Maria, Brown, Grimm, Hitch, John Doe 1 & 2, Shasteen, Tyler, Eyre and Mrs. Smith |
| 2:2018cv00378 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, granting Plaintiff 30 days to file an Amended Complaint, denying 44 Motion to Grant Supplemental Complaint and Serve Defendants and 51 Motion to Strike, denying without prejudice 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel, and denying as moot 49 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/19/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER denying 13 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 37 , 39 and 40 . The Court finds Plaintiff's filings to be excessive and warns Plaintiff that, if he continues to engage in an excessive filing practice, his conduct could result in sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 7/31/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
