Kirby Developments LLC v. XPO Global Forwarding, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kirby Developments LLC
Defendant: XPO Global Forwarding, Inc., Midwest Coal, LLC, Mid America Tire of Hillsboro, Inc., Afif Baltagi, John Eckerd, Todd Wilkin, L.A.D. Impex Corporation and Ahmet Neidik
Case Number: 2:2018cv00500
Filed: May 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: JACKSON
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A. Jolson
Presiding Judge: George C. Smith
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 252 ORDER granting 251 Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims with prejudice and dismissing Defendant XPO's crossclaims without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 11/10/22. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 208 OPINION AND ORDER - XPOs Motion for Summary Judgment 177 is GRANTED as to Kirbys fraud, breach of contract (Client Services Agreement), negligence, and civil conspiracy claims. XPOs Motion for Summary Judgment 177 is DENIED as to Kirbys RICO and breach of contract (Warehouse Security Letter) counts; XPOs Motion to Partially Exclude Expert Testimony of Evan Armstrong is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 178 198 ; Kirbys Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Apply Pennsylvania law to the fraud and any respondeat superior analysis is DENIED 176 181 . Plaintiff shall file a status report detailing the bankruptcy status of the remaining defendants and Plaintiffs intention regarding its claims against each within ten (10) days of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 9/9/2021. (tb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 164 OPINION AND ORDER concluding that 158 Defendant XPO's Motion to Dismiss is MOOT in part and DENIES the remainder Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 2/4/2020. (tb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 XPO's Motion to Stay; granting 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; denying 16 Wilkin's Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 11/20/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirby Developments LLC v. XPO Global Forwarding, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirby Developments LLC
Represented By: Matthew S. Casto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XPO Global Forwarding, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midwest Coal, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mid America Tire of Hillsboro, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Afif Baltagi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Eckerd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Wilkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L.A.D. Impex Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ahmet Neidik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?