Byrd v. JP Morgan Chase

Byrd v. JP Morgan Chase

Plaintiff:	Houston Byrd, Jr.
Defendant:	JP Morgan Chase
Case Number:	2:2018cv00506
Filed:	May 22, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	James L. Graham
Presiding Judge:	Chelsey M. Vascura
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2018	Filing 19 ORDER finding as moot 9 Motion ; finding as moot 11 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot 15 Motion for Default Judgment; finding as moot 18 Motion. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 12/13/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 30, 2018	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Houston Byrd, Jr. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service. Objections to R&R due by 9/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/30/2018. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2018

Filing 19 ORDER finding as moot 9 Motion ; finding as moot 11 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot 15 Motion for Default Judgment; finding as moot 18 Motion. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 12/13/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

August 30, 2018

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Houston Byrd, Jr. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service. Objections to R&R due by 9/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/30/2018. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Byrd v. JP Morgan Chase
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Houston Byrd, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?