DeJarnette v. Shoop et al
| James T. DeJarnette |
| Timothy Shoop, Richard Davis, Doug Byrd, Mutter and Steve Justice |
| 2:2018cv00520 |
| April 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| WARREN |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Chelsey M. Vascura |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, OVERRULING Plaintiff's Objections; STRIKING Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/18/2019. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff be allowed to prosecute his action without prepayment of fees or costs and that judicial o fficers who render services in this action shall do so as if the costs had been prepaid. Further, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DISMISS this action in its entirety pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/31/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
