Hardy v. Tristar Products Inc
Plaintiff: Kyle Hardy
Defendant: TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00705
Filed: July 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel - Hugh J Bode substituting for William Mattes as to Defendant Tristar Products Inc. (Bode, Hugh)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: The Pretrial Conference, August 21, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. IS VACATED and the following schedule is adopted. This case is referred to the March, 2019 SETTLEMENT WEEK. Joinder of Parties due by 10/15/2018. Motions to Amend due by 10/15/2018. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures due by 10/1/2018. Primary Expert due by 1/18/2019. Rebuttal Expert due by 3/15/2019. Discovery due by 3/29/2019. Dispositive motions due by 5/6/2019. Settlement Demand due by 8/14/2018. Response to Settlement Demand due by 8/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on August 21, 2018. (jlk)
August 20, 2018 Notice: The 8/21/2018 at 11:00 AM Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED per Rule 26(f) Report #9 . (sln)
August 14, 2018 Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT of the parties by Plaintiff Kyle Hardy. (Goldstein, David)
July 30, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Michael Burns for Defendant Tristar Products Inc (Burns, Justin)
July 30, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mathew G Drocton for Defendant Tristar Products Inc (Drocton, Mathew)
July 25, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Tristar Products Inc. (Mattes, William)
July 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 8/21/2018 11:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln)
July 19, 2018 Filing 4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet filed by Tristar Products Inc. (er)
July 19, 2018 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND filed initially in Franklin County CPC on 6/11/2018 by Kyle Hardy against Tristar Products Inc. (er)
July 18, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC. (Mattes, William)
July 18, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Common Pleas Court, case number 18CV-004881 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6524082), filed by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Mattes, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardy v. Tristar Products Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Hardy
Represented By: David A Goldstein
Represented By: R. Kelly Phillips, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
Represented By: William M Mattes
Represented By: Hugh J Bode
Represented By: Mathew G Drocton
Represented By: Justin Michael Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?