Doe v. Ohio State University et al
John Doe 1 |
Does 1-100 and Ohio State University |
2:2018cv00712 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
George C Smith |
Michael H Watson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Responses due by 9/28/2018) by Defendant Ohio State University. (Carpenter, Michael) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 10/1/2018 10:00 AM in Chambers, room 208, before Judge Michael Watson and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
NOTICE - Status Conference set for 9/13/18 at 2:30 p.m. is VACATED. (jk) |
NOTICE of Hearing - Status Conference set for 9/13/2018 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 - Columbus before Judge Michael H. Watson. (jk) |
Reset deadlines pursuant to #16 as to Ohio State University: Answer due 9/7/2018. (ew) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION CONSENT TO MOVE, ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT by Defendant Ohio State University. (Carpenter, Michael) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Edwin Dutton for Defendant Ohio State University (Dutton, Stephen) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by David John Barthel for Defendant Ohio State University (Barthel, David) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy R Bricker for Defendant Ohio State University (Bricker, Timothy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Hiram Carpenter for Defendant Ohio State University (Carpenter, Michael) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ohio State University. Served on 7/27/2018. Answer due 8/17/2018. (ew) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: The complaint and issued summons were sent via certified mail to Defendant Ohio State University. (ew) |
Filing 9 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:18-cv-692 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Michael H. Watson for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson and Judge George C. Smith on 7/23/18. (sem) |
Filing 8 NOTATION ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Joseph G. Sauder. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/20/2018. (er) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Ohio State University. (er) |
Filing 5 ORDER transferring case to the Eastern Division at Columbus of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for reassignment to a Judge at that location. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/20/18. (sct) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-6526405) of Joseph G. Sauder by Plaintiff John Doe 1. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Sauder, Joseph) |
Case transferred in from Cincinnati Division Case Number :--. Case assigned to Judge George C. Smith and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sct) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. Service of Process (Karon, Daniel) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Karen L. Litkovitz. (bjc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6522340), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons) (Karon, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.