Campbell et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Mary E. Campbell and Roosevelt Campbell |
| C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc, John Doe and Nurse/RN Jane Doe |
| 2:2018cv00787 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1- Addressing Preliminary Issue and Setting an Status Conference for 9/5/2018 10:00 AM in Room 310 before Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus.). Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/17/2018. Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ et al. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (daf).
|
| Filing 18 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 2:18-cv-00581. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson added. (daf) |
| Filing 17 Case transferred to Southern District of Ohio per Transfer Order for inclusion in MDL No. 2846, IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. The Transferring Clerk's Office hereby attests the record and the docket sheet available through CM/ECF to be the certified list. Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-00228-CMC, 2:18-cv-00580-CMC, 2:18-cv-00581-CMC, 2:18-cv-00582-CMC(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting (78) Motion to Stay in case 3:17-cv-00228-CMC; granting (14) Motion to Stay in case 2:18-cv-00580-CMC; granting (14) Motion to Stay in case 2:18-cv-00581-CMC; granting (14) Motion to Stay in case 2:18-cv-00582-CMC. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 4/26/2018. Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-00228-CMC, 2:18-cv-00580-CMC, 2:18-cv-00581-CMC, 2:18-cv-00582-CMC(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION to Stay All Proceedings by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 5/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - MDL Motion, #2 Exhibit 2 - MDL Motion Supporting Brief, #3 Exhibit 3 - Second Amended Schedule of Related Cases)No proposed order.(Rogers, James) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 13 Plaintiffs Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mary E. Campbell, Roosevelt Campbell.(Seithel, Lynn) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting (9 in 2:18-cv-00580-CMC, 9 in 2:18-cv-00581-CMC, 9 in 2:18-cv-00582-CMC) MOTION for Extension of Time. (Plaintiff's Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 4/13/2018, Motion to Remand due by 5/2/2018) Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/28/2018. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-00580-CMC, 2:18-cv-00581-CMC, 2:18-cv-00582-CMC(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 5/2/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/27/2018, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/25/2018, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/22/2018, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/22/2018, Discovery due by 10/17/2018, Motion in Limine due by 3/11/2019, Motions due by 10/31/2018, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 1/9/2019, Jury Selection Deadline 4/1/2019, ADR Statement due by 11/29/2018, Mediation Due by 12/27/2018. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/28/2018. (cbru, ) Modified to edit text on 3/30/2018 (cbru, ). [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time (Unopposed) by Mary E. Campbell, Roosevelt Campbell. Response to Motion due by 4/11/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Email)No proposed order.(Seithel, Lynn) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc..(Hegler, Adam) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than March 30, 2018. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-00580-CMC, 2:18-cv-00581-CMC, 2:18-cv-00582-CMC(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Berkeley County. (Attachments: #1 Executed Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal )(Hegler, Adam) Modified to edit text on 3/1/2018 (cbru, ). [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc.(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas, Berkeley County, case number 2017-CP-08-02284 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-7638795) filed by Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(cbru, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/7/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
