Griffin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Plaintiff: Calvin Griffin
Defendant: Warden Timothy Buchannon
Petitioner: Calvin M. Griffin
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number: 2:2018cv00839
Filed: August 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: NOBLE
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
2 Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Maura O'Neill Jaite for Respondent Warden, Noble Correctional Institution (Jaite, Maura)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - These cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for this Courts review. The STAY imposed by the Court in Case Number 14-cv-857, Griffin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, is hereby LIFTED. Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases by 11/12/18. Traverse to the Answer due 21 days after the answer is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on September 13, 2018. (jlk)
September 13, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution answer due 11/12/2018. (jlk)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The judges agree that this case and case number 2:14-cv-857 ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Algenon L. Marbley for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson and Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 8/15/2018. (ew)
August 13, 2018 Filing 2 Supplemental Memorandum Supporting re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Addendum To Statement of Facts Supporting Ground One by Plaintiff Calvin Griffin. (Avellano, Andrew)
August 13, 2018 Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0648-6557002.), filed by Calvin Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Avellano, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Timothy Buchannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Calvin Griffin
Represented By: Andrew P. Avellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Calvin M. Griffin
Represented By: Andrew P. Avellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Represented By: Maura O'Neill Jaite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?