PCMG, INC. v. Deeter et al
Plaintiff: PCMG, INC.
Defendant: SHANDA DEETER and BIT DIRECT, INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00902
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2018 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to BIT Direct, Inc. & Shanda Deeter. (er)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER - Setting telephone conference for Friday, 9/14/2018 @ 11:30a.m. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 9/13/2018. (ds)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #2 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 8/24/2018. (ds)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Setting Telephone conference for Friday, August 31, 2018 @ 9:00a.m. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 8/24/2018. (ds)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - Setting Telephone conference for 8/24/18 @ 9:30 a.m. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 8/22/2018. (ds)
August 20, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE by Plaintiff PCMG, INC. Declaration of Nita L. Hanson Regarding Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FedEx Delivery Confirmations, #2 Exhibit Text Messages) (Hanson, Nita)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - Setting Telephone Conference. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 8/20/2018. (ds)
August 17, 2018 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff PCMG, INC.. (Hanson, Nita)
August 17, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Corey Asay for Plaintiff PCMG, INC. (Asay, Joseph)
August 17, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Faith Clair Whittaker for Plaintiff PCMG, INC. (Whittaker, Faith)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff PCMG, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Declaration of K. Connolly, #3 Exhibit Declaration of G. Sisco) (Hanson, Nita)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against SHANDA DEETER ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6563682), filed by PCMG, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acceptance Offer, #2 Exhibit Employee Non-Compete Agreement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Form Summons to Shanda Deeter, #5 Summons Form Summons to BIT Direct, Inc.) (Hanson, Nita)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PCMG, INC. v. Deeter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PCMG, INC.
Represented By: Joseph Corey Asay
Represented By: Nita Lorene Hanson
Represented By: Faith Clair Whittaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHANDA DEETER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BIT DIRECT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?