Byrd v. O'Connor
| Houston Byrd |
| Maureen O'Connor |
| 2:2018cv00950 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| George C Smith |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Strike #12 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Defendant Maureen O'Connor. (Koppitch, Nicole) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Judgement Order and to Strike #12 Response in Opposition to Motion by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Defendant Maureen O'Connor. (Koppitch, Nicole) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Maureen O'Connor. (Koppitch, Nicole) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Change Venue by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Findings, R. 52 with respect to the date on the Summons by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Andrew Fraser for Defendant Maureen O'Connor (Fraser, J.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Responses due by 10/4/2018) by Defendant Maureen O'Connor. (Koppitch, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Maureen O'Connor. (er) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration to #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/30/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Three Judge Panel by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Houston Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/28/2018) (er). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Houston Byrd against Maureen O'Connor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Envelope) (er) |
| Filing fee received: receipt number 200COL053548, $400. (ew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Byrd v. O'Connor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maureen O'Connor | |
| Represented By: | Nicole M. Koppitch |
| Represented By: | J. Andrew Fraser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Houston Byrd | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
