In re: Vickie M. Stringer
| Vickie M. Stringer |
| Sterling A. Williams and Percy Squire |
| US Bankruptcy Court - Columbus |
| Vickie M Stringer |
| 2:2018cv00979 |
| August 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File New date requested 11/26/2018. by Appellant Percy Squire. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Squire, Percy) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Certification of Record on Appeal. Appellant Brief due by 10/25/2018. Appellee Brief due by 11/8/2018. Appellant Reply Brief due by 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Appellant Designation, #2 Appellee Designation) (er) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The parties briefing schedule will be established once the District Court receives the Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Certification of Record on Appeal. Bankruptcy Court case number 2:17-bk-51730. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Transmittal Cover Sheet, #3 doc 156- Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Memorandum Opinion, #4 Doc 171- Final Judgment, #5 Doc 188- Order Denying Motion of Percy Squire to Alter or Amend Judgment) (er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
