Bush v. State of Ohio et al
| Stephen L. Bush |
| State of Ohio and Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution |
| 2:2018cv01107 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| George C Smith |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/24/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred in from Cincinnati Division on 09/25/2018 Case Number 1:18-cv-658. Case assigned to Judge George C. Smith and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson.. Related document: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) filed by Stephen L. Bush. (jlw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Stephen L. Bush. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (jlw)IFP Motion scanned as received. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
