Kery et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
Santina Kery and Alfred F. Kery |
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc. |
2:2018cv01180 |
October 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Edmund A Sargus |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 BRIEF by Defendants Bard Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ et al. (Kloss, William) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of New Jersey; Case Number 2:18-cv-13351. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson added. (daf) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BARD DAVOL, INC., C.R. BARD INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sms) [Transferred from New Jersey on 10/4/2018.] |
Judge William H. Walls and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (eu, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 10/4/2018.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARD DAVOL, INC., C.R. BARD INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8988809) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SANTINA KERY, ALFRED F. KERY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed)(FARNOLO, NICHOLAS) [Transferred from New Jersey on 10/4/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.