Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Lash Industries, Inc. et al
| Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs |
| Lash Industries, Inc. and Daniel P. Lash |
| 2:2018cv01324 |
| October 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| James L Graham |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs (Ball, Steven) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Daniel P. Lash served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (er) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Lash Industries, Inc. served on 11/13/2018, answer due 12/4/2018. (er) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons were sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (er) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Lash Industries, Inc. and Daniel P. Lash. (ew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6656831), filed by Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form) (Ball, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
