Fox v. National HME, Inc. et al
| Michelle Fox |
| Clay Ingram and National HME, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv01378 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| George C Smith |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 6/14/2019. Motions to Amend due by 6/14/2019. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures due by 5/17/2019. Discovery due by 1/10/2020. Dispositive motions due by 2/14/2020. Settlement Demand due by 5/8/2019. Response due 21 days after demand. Settlement Conference in 12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/12/19. (jr) Modified on 4/12/2019 to correct text (jr).
|
| Filing 20 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant National HME, Inc.. (Moore, Curtis) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2019 @ 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr) |
| Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc., National HME, Inc., National HME, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent National HME, Inc. for Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc... (Moore, Curtis) |
| Filing 17 Defendants National HME, Inc and Clay Ingram ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by All Defendants. (Moore, Curtis) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc. (er) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Clay Ingram answer due 2/21/2019; National HME, Inc. answer due 2/21/2019. (er) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Move or Otherwise Plead Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1 by Defendants Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc.. (Moore, Curtis) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Curtis G. Moore for Defendants Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc. (Moore, Curtis) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Mark Loewengart for Defendants Clay Ingram, National HME, Inc. (Loewengart, Steven) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons were sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (er) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed: National HME, Inc. served on 1/17/2019, answer due 2/7/2019. (er) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Clay Ingram & National HME, Inc. (er) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. PRAECIPE FOR ISSUANCE (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons x2) (Bruce, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (er) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to National HME, Inc. (er) |
| Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Clay Ingram & National HME, Inc. (er) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. PRAECIPE FOR ISSUANCE (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons x1) (Bruce, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: National HME, Inc. served on 11/27/2018, answer due 12/18/2018. (er) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint an issued summons were sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (er) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Clay Ingram and National HME, Inc. (er) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Michelle Fox ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6668824), filed by Michelle Fox. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue, #3 Summons Form Summons x3) (Bruce, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
