Shaffer v. City of Columbus et al
| Mary Shaffer |
| Sheriff Dallas Baldwin and City of Columbus |
| 2:2018cv01457 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Michael H Watson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Answer of Defendant City of Columbus to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by City of Columbus. (Lloyd, Paula) |
| Reset deadlines pursuant to #5 as to Sheriff Dallas Baldwin: Answer due 2/4/2019. (ew) Modified link on 1/8/2019 (ew). |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of extension of time to move or plead by Defendant Sheriff Dallas Baldwin. (Hiers, Amy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy L Hiers for Defendant Sheriff Dallas Baldwin (Hiers, Amy) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to City of Columbus on 11/14/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Sobel, Sean) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Sheriff Dallas Baldwin on 11/14/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Sobel, Sean) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6679212), filed by Mary Shaffer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sobel, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
