Majestic Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
| Majestic Building Maintenance, Inc. |
| Huntington Bancshares Incorporated dba The Huntington National Bank and Huntington Bancshares Incorporated |
| 2:2018cv01512 |
| November 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| James L Graham |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| George C Smith |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Banks and Banking |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1971 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Majestic Building Maintenance, Inc. (Zervas, John) |
Filing 3
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The judges agree that cases 2:15-cv-3023 and 2:18-cv-1512 ARE related. Case 2:18-cv-1512 reassigned to Judge James L. Graham and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge George C. Smith and Judge James L. Graham on 12/12/2018. (ew)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND Class Action against Huntington Bancshares Incorporated dba The Huntington National Bank ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6690412), filed by Majestic Building Maintenance, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Huntington Valid Check, #4 Exhibit C - Huntington Letter, #5 Exhibit D - Wood & Long Letter, #6 Exhibit E - Huntington Letter 3.17.15) (Zervas, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
