Coakley v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Darlene Mae Coakley
Defendant: Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Case Number: 2:2018cv01563
Filed: December 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2019 Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 3:19-cv-00022, filed 01/02/2019. (pb)
December 31, 2018 Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -120) - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litjgation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson (pb)
December 31, 2018 Case transferred to District of USDC of New Jersey.Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (pb)
December 11, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form) (sem)
December 4, 2018 Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., filed by Darlene Mae Coakley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rourke, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. to Imerys Talc America, Inc. (Rourke, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. to Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Rourke, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. to Johnson & Johnson (Rourke, Michael)
December 4, 2018 Filing fee received: $400. Receipt number: 0648-6703537. (ew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coakley v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene Mae Coakley
Represented By: Michael Joseph Rourke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?