Rover Pipeline LLC v. Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.
Rover Pipeline LLC |
Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc. |
2:2019cv00034 |
January 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Edmund A Sargus |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: This case is referred to the March 2020 SETTLEMENT WEEK. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures due by 4/1/2019. Primary Expert due by 10/1/2019. Rebuttal Expert due by 11/1/2019. Discovery due by 12/16/2019. Dispositive motions due by 1/22/2020. Settlement Demand due by 3/1/2020. Response to Settlement Demand due by 3/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 2/15/2019. (daf) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 2/14/2019. (agm) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference RE-SET for 2/14/2019 at 4:00 PM via Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. ***This is a time change only.*** (agm) |
Filing 8 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.. (James, Robert) |
Filing 7 NOTATION ORDER construing #6 Stipulation filed by Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc. as a JOINT MOTION and GRANTING leave to file third-party complaint by 2/15/2019. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/24/2019. (agm) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR THE DEFENDANT HYDROCARBON WELL SERVICE, INC. TO FILE A THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT by Defendant Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.. (James, Robert) |
Filing 5 DEFENDANT HYDROCARBON WELL SERVICE, INC.'S ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.. (James, Robert) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 2/14/2019 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc., filed by Rover Pipeline LLC. (daf) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.. (James, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF DEFENDANT HYDROCARBON WELL SERVICE, INC. from Court of Common Pleas Belmont County Ohio, case number 18-cv-0471 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6739293), filed by Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (James, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rover Pipeline LLC v. Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hydrocarbon Well Service, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert C James |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC | |
Represented By: | Ryan P Sherman |
Represented By: | Christopher J. Dutton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.