Saylor v. Taco Bell et al
Lindsey Saylor |
Taco Bell, Molly (LNU) and Cema, Inc. |
2:2019cv00040 |
January 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
George C Smith |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 3/15/2019. by Defendants Molly (LNU), Cema, Inc., Taco Bell. (Tackett, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lorenzo Washington for Plaintiff Lindsey Saylor (Washington, Lorenzo) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Cema, Inc. served on 1/24/2019, answer due 2/14/2019; Taco Bell served on 1/24/2019, answer due 2/14/2019. (er) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Molly (LNU) served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019; Cema, Inc. served on 1/22/2019, answer due 2/12/2019. (er) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons were sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (er) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Molly (LNU), Cema, Inc. & Taco Bell. (er) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6740025), filed by Lindsey Saylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons x4, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Exhibit A Nardone Letter) (Spitz, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.