Smotherman v. United States of America
Sontay T. Smotherman, r |
United States of America |
2:2019cv00175 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Edmund A Sargus |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Michael H Watson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 USCA Case Number 19-3189 for #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Sontay T. Smotherman, r. (pb) |
Set deadlines pursuant to #15 : Deficiency Deadline by 3/25/2019. (ew) |
Filing 15 ORDER - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to pay the $505.00 filing fee in full or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, submitting the required documentation, WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/11/2019. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL (FILING FEE DUE) by Plaintiff Sontay T. Smotherman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the February 25, 2019 Opinion and Order, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 1915A. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 12 OPINION and ORDER OVERRULING #10 Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Order; denying #11 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/25/19. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint by Plaintiff Sontay T. Smotherman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 10 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order re #8 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Sontay T. Smotherman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing fee for cv action: $ 400.00, receipt number 200COL055775. (er) |
Filing 9 Mail sent to Sontay T. Smotherman, FCI Ashland returned as undeliverable. Contents include: #2 Related Case Memorandum Order. (ew) |
Filing 8 ORDER and DEFICIENCY NOTICE denying #7 Motion for Pro Bono Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 2/7/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Bono Counsel by Plaintiff Sontay T. Smotherman. (Attachments: #1 CJA 23, #2 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 6 ORDER and DEFICIENCY NOTICE granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. If Plaintiff intends to pursue this action, he must either pay the $400 filing fee or file a properly supported application to proceed in forma pauperis NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 27, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/29/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Deficiency Deadline by 2/27/2019. (daf) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Sontay T. Smotherman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 4 ORDER and DEFICIENCY NOTICE: If Plaintiff intends to pursue this action, he must either pay the $400 filing fee or file a properly supported application to proceed in forma pauperis WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/18/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/18/2019: #1 Application and Affidavit by Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees) (daf). |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:12-cr-55 (3) ARE related. Case reassigned to Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Vascura for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Judge Michael H. Watson on 1/18/2019. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Deficiency Deadline by 2/17/2019. (daf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by Sontay T. Smotherman, r. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice, Consent and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, #3 Duplicate, #4 Envelope) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smotherman v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sontay T. Smotherman, r | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.