Ebert v. Amalgamated Transit Union et al
| Renee Ebert |
| Amalgamated Transit Union and Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority |
| 2:2019cv00283 |
| January 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| George C Smith |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (D'Anniballe, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority served on 2/4/2019, answer due 2/25/2019. (er) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: The complaint and issued summons were sent via certified mail to the Defendants. (ew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Amalgamated Transit Union and Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority. (ew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Amalgamated Transit Union, Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6770669), filed by Renee Ebert. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority, #2 Summons Form Summons Amalgamated Transit Union, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A - EEOC Determination, #5 Exhibit Exhibit B - EEOC Right to Sue) (Lalak, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
