Hoffman v. MADICORP et al
| Gary Wayne Hoffman |
| Deere and Company, LLC and MADICORP |
| 2:2019cv02245 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTATION ORDER: The Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Alexis I. Lehmann is GRANTED . By Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/27/2019. (daf)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-6983448) of Alexis I. Lehmann by Plaintiff Gary Wayne Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Alexis I. Lehmann, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Dooley, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Deere and Company, LLC, and MADICORP. (daf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6943858), filed by Gary Wayne Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Authorization, #3 Exhibit 2 - Advisory Opinion to Rosen (06-09-98) _ Federal Trade Commission, #4 Exhibit 3 - Advisory Opinion to Hawkey (12-18-97) _ Federal Trade Commission, #5 Summons Form John Deere, #6 Summons Form MADICORP) (Dooley, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
