Garrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Diana Lynn Garrett |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2019cv02410 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/1/2019, answer due 8/30/2019. (jlk) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 7/16/19. (sem)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Lewis, Ameenah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ameenah Lewis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Lewis, Ameenah) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Sarah D. Morrison for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/1/19. (jcw)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTATION ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Edward A. Wicklund. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on June 11, 2019. (jlk)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-6961178) of Edward A. Wicklund by Plaintiff Diana Lynn Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Brian, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jlk) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Diana Lynn Garrett. (jlk) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on June 10, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (jlk)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Diana Lynn Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 USM-285 Forms, #9 USM-285 Forms, #10 USM-285 Forms, #11 USM-285 Forms) (Brian, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garrett v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Represented By: | Ameenah Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diana Lynn Garrett | |
| Represented By: | Richard F Brian |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
