Carty v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Pat Carty |
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. |
2:2019cv02650 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Michael H Watson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. identifying Corporate Parents G4S Holding One, Inc.; G4S USA Holdings Limited; G4S Corporate Services Limited; and G4S plc. (Chermely, Abby) Modified text on 8/16/2019 (ew). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer Venue Under Rule 12(B)(3) by Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Chermely, Abby) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Plaintiff Pat Carty Of Filing Consent Form To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Consent of Timothy Wroda) (Moyle, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Plaintiff Pat Carty Of Filing Consent Form To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Consent of Brighan Madriz) (Moyle, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Plaintiff Pat Carty Of Filing Consent Form To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Consent of Brock Smith, #2 Consent of Demetres Williams) (Moyle, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc., filed by Pat Carty. (Moyle, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.'s Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.. (Chermely, Abby) |
Reset Deadlines: Answer due 8/12/2019. (ew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Abby E. Chermely for Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (Chermely, Abby) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. Served on 7/1/2019. Answer due 7/22/2019. (ew) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: Summons & complaint sent by certified mail to G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (kk2) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (kk2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6978570), filed by Pat Carty. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Exhibit A- Consent of Pat Carty) (Moyle, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carty v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pat Carty | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Joseph Moyle |
Represented By: | Shannon Marie Draher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. | |
Represented By: | Abby E. Chermely |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.