Ervin v. Crisler
| Richard Ervin |
| Matthew Crisler |
| 2:2019cv02986 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: In view of Plaintiff's apparent misapprehension that he could pay the $5.00 filing fee assessed for Habeas Corpus Petitions rather than the applicable $350.00 filing fee assessed for Civil Complaints if in forma pauperis status is granted, the Court will allow Plaintiff FOURTEEN DAYS in which to notify this Court of whether he intends to pursue this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/23/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Richard Ervin (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Richard Ervin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: If Plaintiff intends to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to either (1) pay the full $400 filing fee or (2) submit, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, the required trust fund statement from his prisons cashier. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 7/12/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Set Deadlines: Deficiency Deadline (daf) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - the Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 07/10/2019. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred in from Western Division - Cincinnati Division on 07/10/2019 Case Number 1:19-cv-547. Case assigned to Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura.. Related document: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) filed by Richard Ervin. (bjc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Richard Ervin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Envelope) (bjc) Modified Docket Text on 7/8/2019 (bjc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ervin v. Crisler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Matthew Crisler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Ervin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
