Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC f/k/a Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. and Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv03486
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7150895) of Timothy L. Frey by Plaintiff Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Kopp, Jeremy)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join Necessary and Indispensable by Defendant Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Sarnowski, Phillip)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC answer due 10/2/2019. (jr)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Stipulation of Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC. (Sarnowski, Phillip) Modified on 9/6/2019 to correct event (jr).
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC f/k/a Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. (er)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company.. (Kopp, Jeremy)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC f/k/a Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons in Civil Action) (Kopp, Jeremy) (Main and attachment replaced on 8/19/2019) (er).
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0648-7056985 (daf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC f/k/a Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Represented By: Phillip Michael Sarnowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Jeremy R. Kopp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?