Steele v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections et al
Charles M. Steele |
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections, Gary Morh, Tim Shoop, Warden Charlotte Jenkins and Richard T. Cholar, Jr. |
2:2019cv03548 |
August 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Edmund A Sargus |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Charles M. Steele. (er) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Charles M. Steele. (jlk) |
Filing 2 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: ORDER - GRANTING Plaintiff's #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Objections to R&R due by 9/5/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on August 22, 2019. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Charles M. Steele. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Forms, #4 Marshal Forms, #5 Envelope) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.