Yost v. DolGen Midwest, LLC et al
| Samantha Yost |
| Dollar General Corporation and DolGen Midwest, LLC |
| 2:2019cv03621 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H Watson |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT A to #2 Motion to Dismiss. (Stevens, Natalie) Modified text on 10/17/2019 (ew). |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants DolGen Midwest, LLC and Dollar General Corporation identifying Corporate Parents DG Strategic I, LLC and Dollar General Corporation for DolGen Midwest, LLC. (Stevens, Natalie) Modified text on 10/18/2019 (ew). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss , or Alternatively, MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint Pending Arbitration by Defendants DolGen Midwest, LLC, Dollar General Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Debbie Roach See #4 for document.) (Stevens, Natalie) Modified attachment description on 10/17/2019 (ew). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7070372), filed by Samantha Yost. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Coffman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
