Smith v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff: Larry Smith
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv03668
Filed: August 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. (Mace, Damond)
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of West Virginia Southern; Case Number 2:19-cv-00451. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
August 22, 2019 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers added. (daf)
August 20, 2019 Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-113) JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL: certified copy from the Southern District of Ohio transferring this action to the USDC/SDOH for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 8/20/2019. (cc: attys) (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]
August 20, 2019 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION FROM JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION re: Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-113), MDL 2433. (kew) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]
June 13, 2019 CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]
June 13, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (lca) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]
June 13, 2019 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (lca) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7281158. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (lca) [Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 8/22/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Smith
Represented By: Richard W Schulte
Represented By: Robert P. Fitzsimmons
Represented By: Clayton J. Fitzsimmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Represented By: Marques P.D. Richeson
Represented By: Stephen M Fazio
Represented By: Damond R Mace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?