Boyer v. Big Sandy Furniture, Inc.
Victoria Boyer |
Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. |
2:2019cv04185 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Algenon L Marbley |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (cw) |
Filing 10 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: The November 12, 2019 preliminary pretrial conference is VACATED. Joinder of Parties due by 12/12/2019. Motions to Amend due by 12/12/2019. Initial Disclosures due by 12/12/2019. Discovery due by 7/1/2020. Dispositive motions due by 8/3/2020. Primary Expert due by 5/1/2020. Rebuttal Expert due by 5/15/2020. Settlement Demand due by 1/13/2020. Response to Settlement Demand due by 1/27/2020. Mediation Deadline: 7/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/7/2019. (daf) |
Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Big Sandy Furniture, Inc.. (Jones, Christopher) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/12/2019 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. Please Note:The Rule 26(f) Report for the Eastern Division has changed. Please ensure that you are using the correct form. (agm) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Big Sandy Furniture, Inc.. (Jones, Christopher) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Jones for Defendant Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. (Jones, Christopher) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, For Damages and Reinstatement filed by All Defendants. (Jones, Christopher) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Big Sandy Furniture, Inc.. Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. served on 10/2/2019, answer due 10/23/2019. (jlk) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: The Clerk of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint via certified mail to Defendant: Big Sandy Furniture, Inc., 7019 1120 0002 0043 6040. (jlk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. (jlk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND FOR DAMAGES AND REINSTATEMENT against Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7118641), filed by Victoria Boyer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Summons Form Summons Form) (Washington, Lorenzo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyer v. Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Victoria Boyer | |
Represented By: | Lorenzo Washington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Big Sandy Furniture, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Christopher Michael Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.