Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Defendant: Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Case Number: 2:2019cv05052
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Order signed by Judge George C. Smith on 12/10/2019. (mdr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #3 . This Court finds that Plaintiff's objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED. The Order and Report and Recommendation, Document 3, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 12/10/2019. (mdr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 6, 2019 Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff William Lee Grant, II. (mdr)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Complaint filed by William Lee Grant, II. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No #1 ). Also it is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief maybe granted. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/22/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 22, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Central Intelligence Agency, and Special Collection Service, filed by William Lee Grant, II. (daf)
November 18, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons and USM 285 Forms) by Plaintiff William Lee Grant, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Envelope) (mdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Collection Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?