King v. Yost et al
| Derrick King |
| David Anthony Yost, Kimberly Hall and Terri L Burns |
| 2:2019cv05522 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Derrick King (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (daf) |
Filing 3
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Complaint filed by Derrick King. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. #1 . It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e). ( Objections to R&R due by 1/14/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 12/31/2019. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Terri L Burns, Kimberly Hall, and David Anthony Yost, filed by Derrick King. (daf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Derrick King. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Forms, #4 Marshal Forms, #5 Envelope) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
