Naluzze v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
| Helen Naluzze |
| Debbie Kelley, Hannah Clark and Aramark Services, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00914 |
| February 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Michael H Watson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Aramark Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parents Aramark Intermediate HoldCo Corporation and Aramark. (Freudiger, Ray) Modified text on 4/17/2020 (ew). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Freudiger, Ray) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Aramark Services, Inc. on 2/19/2020, answer due 4/20/2020. (Freudiger, Ray) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Hannah Clark on 2/19/2020, answer due 4/20/2020. (Freudiger, Ray) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Debbie Kelley on 2/19/2020, answer due 4/20/2020. (Freudiger, Ray) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Aramark Services, Inc., Hannah Clark, Debbie Kelley ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7340693), filed by Helen Naluzze. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter of Determination, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Holloway, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
