Mobley v. City of Columbus et al
Plaintiff: Alphonso Mobley, Jr.
Defendant: Matthew Staker and City of Columbus
Case Number: 2:2020cv01176
Filed: March 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion for Certification; denying 17 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; denying 18 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/8/2020. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Overruling Plaintiff's Objection; denying at moot 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice; denying as moot Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss. This case is terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/12/2020. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 3 Complaint filed by Alphonso Mobley, Jr. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. (ECF No. 1 .) In addition, it is RECOMMENDED that to the extent the success of Plaintiff 9;s Fourth Amendment claim would imply the invalidity of his state-court conviction or sentence, that claim be DISMISSED as Heck-barred WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling should Plaintiff prove that [his] conviction or sentence has been reversed on direc t appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Heck, 512 U.S. at 48687. Finally, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). ( Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2020),. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 3/30/2020. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mobley v. City of Columbus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Staker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Columbus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alphonso Mobley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?