Patton v. United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc. et al
| Brian Patton |
| United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc. and Steven Larkin |
| 2:2020cv01213 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SHOW CAUSE ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why the claims against Defendant United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc. should not be dismissed for want of prosecution WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Order unless Plaintiff has requested that the Clerk enter default in the interim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/20/2020. (daf)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc.. United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc. served on 3/16/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. (Parker, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Steven Larkin, and United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc.. (daf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Steven Larkin, United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7366735), filed by Brian Patton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form) (Parker, Geoffrey) (Attachments 1, 2, and 3 were replaced on 3/10/2020) (daf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
