McGee v. Suciu et al
Plaintiff: |
Kristopher McGee |
Defendant: |
David C Suciu, Erin Fuller and Nurse Brown |
Case Number: |
2:2020cv01625 |
Filed: |
March 30, 2020 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Presiding Judge: |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Referring Judge: |
Michael H Watson |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 13, 2022 |
Filing
66
ORDER adopting 65 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 1/13/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
December 21, 2021 |
Filing
65
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Defendant Brown's 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and that all claims against Defendant Brown be DISMISSED WI THOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's motion for Leave for Amended Pretrial Order (Doc. 63) is denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/21/2021. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
October 21, 2021 |
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER granting 54 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Nurse Brown may file a motion for summary judgment on or before 10/28/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/21/2021. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
September 14, 2021 |
Filing
56
OPINION and ORDER adopting 42 the Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 43 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 52 MOTION to Strike; denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/14/2021. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
June 7, 2021 |
Filing
42
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that Plaintiff's 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and that Defendants David Suciu and Erin Fuller's 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART AND DE NIED IN PART. Defendants' 38 MOTION to Strike and 41 MOTION to Provide Supplemental Evidence are DENIED. This case is REFERRED to mediation before Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel, to be conducted no later than July 31, 2021. Objections to R&R period is STAYED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/7/2021. (kk2)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
October 5, 2020 |
Filing
15
ORDER adopting 13 the Report and Recommendation; denying 7 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 10/5/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
July 28, 2020 |
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that 7 Motion for Default Judgment be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 7/28/2020. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?