Duncan v. LaRose et al
Richard Duncan |
Ohio General Assembly, Frank LaRose and Governor Mike DeWine |
2:2020cv02295 |
May 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Michael H Watson |
Civil Rights: Voting |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 2:13-cv-1157 are NOT related. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Judge Michael H. Watson on 7/1/2020. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Defendant Frank LaRose. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Thompson v. DeWine, 6th Cir. No. 20-3526 (June 16, 2020)) (Watson, Halli) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Richard Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Mike DeWine. (Watson, Halli) |
Filing 16 OPINION and ORDER denying #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/4/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Ohio General Assembly. (Watson, Halli) |
Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Frank LaRose. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Duncan v. Husted, USCA/6th Cir., Case No. 15-4017 Order) (Watson, Halli) |
NOTICE of Hearing - Telephone Status Conference set for 6/3/2020 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Michael H. Watson. (jk) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Emergency Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Richard Duncan. (ew) |
Filing 12 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Richard Duncan. (ew) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ohio General Assembly. Served on 5/14/2020. Answer due 6/4/2020. (ew) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Mike DeWine. Served on 5/22/2020. Answer due 6/12/2020. (ew) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Frank LaRose. Served on 5/15/2020. Answer due 6/5/2020. (ew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L. Buchanan for Defendants Mike DeWine, Frank LaRose, Ohio General Assembly (Buchanan, Heather) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Halli Brownfield Watson for Defendants Mike DeWine, Frank LaRose, Ohio General Assembly (Watson, Halli) |
Filing 6 OPINION and ORDER denying #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/15/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Emergency Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Richard Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ew) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Mailing of the complaint and issued summons sent by certified mail to the defendants by the Clerk on 5/12/20. (sem) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mike DeWine, Frank LaRose and Ohio General Assembly. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form) (sem) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 200COL061602 (jlk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Duncan against Mike DeWine, Frank LaRose and Ohio General Assembly. (er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.