Merck v. Walmart Inc.
| Thomas Merck |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02908 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTATION ORDER granting #13 & #14 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Christiana L Signs & James N Boudreau by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/29/2020 (kk2)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7575855) of James N. Boudreau by Defendant Walmart Inc. (Richards, John)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $400 paid, receipt number 0648-7575855) of James N. Boudreau; Christiana L. Signs by Defendant Walmart Inc. (Richards, John)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTATION ORDER granting #10 & #11 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Beth E Terrell and Erika L Nusser by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/23/2020 (kk2)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7567659) of Erika L. Nusser by Plaintiff Thomas Merck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Boyle, Michael) Modified atty name on 7/23/2020 (kk2)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7567649) of Beth E. Terrell by Plaintiff Thomas Merck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit 2-Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Boyle, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 8/20/2020 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Defendant Walmart Inc. (Richards, John)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTATION ORDER granting #5 & #6 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of E Michelle Drake & Joseph C Hashmall by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/20/2020 (kk2)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7560765) of Joseph C. Hashmall by Plaintiff Thomas Merck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Boyle, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7560754) of E. Michelle Drake by Plaintiff Thomas Merck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Boyle, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTATION ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to Walmart Inc. Answer due 7/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 6/25/2020. (EPD)
|
|
Filing 3
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Walmart Inc. & Plaintiff Thomas Merck. New date requested 7/20/2020. (Richards, John) Modified text & parties on 6/26/2020 (kk2)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Walmart Inc. (mdr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Walmart Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7493920), filed by Thomas Merck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Summons Form) (Boyle, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
