Munk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Daniel Devon Munk |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2020cv04098 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Sarah D Morrison |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTATION ORDER granting in part #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Commissioner of Social Security answer due 11/9/2020. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 10/5/2020. (agm) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 12/8/2020. by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING case to United States Magistrate Judge Vascura for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 9/1/2020. (tb) |
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 9/1/2020.SEE DOCKET #7 FOR DOCUMENT. This entry is being created to utilize the correct filing event (kk2) |
Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Daniel Devon Munk. (daf) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within sixty (60) days after filing of the Social Security Identification Form, which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff's Statement of Errors due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Commissioner's response due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Plaintiff may reply fifteen (15) days thereafter. If all parties consent to disposition of this case by the Magistrate Judge, parties should file their consents within thirty (30) days after service of the Administrative Record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent Form) (daf) |
Set/Reset Commissioner of Social Security answer date. (daf) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel Devon Munk. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brian, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Munk v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup |
Represented By: | John J. Stark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Devon Munk | |
Represented By: | Richard F Brian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.