Cephas-Hill v. Linden Medical Center/Mid-Ohio Family Practice Associates et al
Kelly Cephas-Hill |
WEST BROAD FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER, LINDEN MEDICAL CENTER/MID-OHIO FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES and NATHANIEL THOMPSON |
2:2020cv04281 |
August 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Michael H Watson |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Answer Deadlines (ew) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Nathaniel Thompson on 8/21/2020, answer due 10/20/2020. (Stepter, Rayl) Modified service and answer dates on 8/28/2020 (ew). |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Linden Medical Center/Mid-Ohio Family Practice Associates and West Broad Family Health Care Center on 8/21/2020, answer due 10/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Waiver for Mid-Ohio Family Practice as identified by Defendant) (Stepter, Rayl) Modified text on 8/28/2020 (ew). |
Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Linden Medical Center/Mid-Ohio Family Practice Associates on 8/21/2020, answer due 10/20/2020. (Stepter, Rayl) Modified service and answer dates on 8/28/2020 (ew). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7618499), filed by Kelly Cephas-Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Stepter, Rayl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.