Krieger v. Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37
| Lynette Krieger |
| Lowe's Homes Centers, LLC, Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 and Doe Defendants 1-5 |
| 2:2020cv04594 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 11/5/2020 03:00 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lynette Krieger. (Gradisar, Gilbert) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint Instanter by Plaintiff Lynette Krieger. (Gradisar, Gilbert) |
Filing 11
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Venue and Jurisdiction Deadline due by 10/28/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 11/30/2020. Motions to Amend due by 11/30/2020. Initial Disclosures due by 10/28/2020. Discovery due by 7/9/2021. Clawback Agreement Deadline due by 11/13/2020. Dispositive motions due by 8/23/2021. Primary Expert due by 4/9/2021. Rebuttal Expert due by 5/10/2021. Settlement Demand due by 11/13/2020. Response to Settlement Demand due by 12/4/2020. Mediation Deadline: 6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 10/15/2020. (mdr)
|
| NOTICE : The PPTC set for 10/15/2020 at 10:30 AM is VACATED. (See ECF No. #10 .) (sln) |
| Filing 10 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 & Plaintiff Lynette Krieger (Oldham, Douglas) Modified parties on 10/13/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Defendant Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37. (Oldham, Douglas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Lynette Krieger. (Gradisar, Gilbert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 10/15/2020 10:30 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #5 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 (Oldham, Douglas) Modified party name on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 and Doe Defendants 1-5 filed by Lynette Krieger (State Court Complaint filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio on 7/31/20). (sem) Modified party name and added jury demand on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 (Oldham, Douglas) Modified party name on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas M. Oldham for Defendant Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 (Oldham, Douglas) Modified party name on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen M. Anderson for Defendant Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 (Oldham, Douglas) Modified text on 9/4/2020 (sem). Modified party name on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, case number 20CV-07-4999 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7639685), filed by Lowes Companies Inc, Store #37 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit A, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C-Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration) (Oldham, Douglas) Modified text and party name on 9/9/2020 (kk2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
