Mages v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Steven Mages |
| U.S. Bank and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv04651 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. as to U.S. Bank (Attachments: #1 Summons - US Bank) (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons Praecipe for Issuance of Alias Summons (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution as to Defendant U.S. Bank WITHIN 14 DAYS unless he has applied for an entry of default from the Clerk in the interim. Show Cause Response due by 11/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 26, 2020. (jlk) Modified text on 10/27/2020 (kk2)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/2020 11:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (sln) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint And Affirmative Defendants filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Berens, Daniel) Modified text on 10/19/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Dedfendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Berens, Daniel) Modified text on 10/19/2020 (kk2) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel W. Berens for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Berens, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant U.S. Bank. U.S. Bank served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 9/25/2020, answer due 10/16/2020. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
|
Filing 5
NOTATION ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Yitzchak Zelman by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/29/2020 (kk2)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7678222) of Yitzchak Zelman by Plaintiff Steven Mages. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Yitzchak Zelman, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Hilton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., U.S. Bank. (bjc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - This case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division in Columbus. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 09/08/2020. (bjc)
|
| Case transferred in from Western Division - Cincinnati on 09/08/2020 Case Number 1:20-cv-696. Case assigned to Judge Sarah D. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers. (bjc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7643076), filed by Steven Mages. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form for Experian Information Solutions, Inc., #3 Summons Form for U.S. Bank) (Hilton, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
