Binder et al v. Brentlinger Enterprises et al
Austin Binder and Jason Mudd |
Rich Hertenstein and Brentlinger Enterprises agent of d/b/a Midwestern Auto Group |
2:2020cv05123 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
James L Graham |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Rich Hertenstein on 9/30/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. (Knoll, Laren) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel I'Anson Bryant for Plaintiffs Austin Binder, Jason Mudd (Bryant, Daniel) |
NOTICE of Appearance by Beau K Rymers for Defendant Brentlinger EnterprisesSEE DOCKET #2 FOR DOCUMENT (kk2) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Brentlinger Enterprises on 9/30/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. (Duraney, Christine) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine M. Duraney for Defendant Brentlinger Enterprises (Duraney, Christine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Brentlinger Enterprises, Rich Hertenstein ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7681341), filed by Austin Binder, Jason Mudd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Binder - Right to Sue 8.27.2020, #2 Exhibit 2 - Mudd - Right to Sue 8.27.2020, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Knoll, Laren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.